GLOBAL ROUTE BLOCKS

Global Server Locations

Coverage across 90+ countries / 200+ routes. Start with a region, then compare IEPL, relay and direct routes. Clear route names make it easier to choose based on distance, purpose and connection performance.

Start Free View Plans
Unlimited devices 30-day money-back guarantee No email address required
REGION INDEX

Browse International Routes by Region

Use the table below to review available regions, cities and route types. The Streaming column indicates that routes for that use case are available in the region. In practice, select an entry marked for the relevant purpose in the client and follow the destination service’s current regional detection.

Country / Region City Route Type Streaming
Asia-Pacific
Japan Tokyo IEPL Supported
Japan Osaka Relay Supported
Singapore Singapore IEPL Supported
Hong Kong, China Hong Kong IEPL Supported
South Korea Seoul Relay Supported
Taiwan, China Taipei Relay Streaming route required
Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Direct Streaming route required
Thailand Bangkok Direct Streaming route required
North America
United States Los Angeles IEPL Supported
United States San Jose Relay Supported
United States New York Direct Streaming route required
Canada Toronto Direct Supported
Europe
United Kingdom London IEPL Supported
Germany Frankfurt Relay Streaming route required
France Paris Direct Supported
Netherlands Amsterdam Direct Streaming route required
Sweden Stockholm Direct Streaming route required
Other Regions
Australia Sydney Relay Supported
United Arab Emirates Dubai Relay Streaming route required
Brazil São Paulo Direct Streaming route required
ROUTE TYPES

How the Three Route Types Work

Route type describes the path used between the local network and the exit node. It affects cross-network detours, peak-time variation and service costs, but cannot be evaluated separately from your location, access provider and destination service.

IEPL

IEPL: A More Focused Path

IEPL focuses on how the cross-border segment is organized. Compared with paths that rely entirely on public networks for hop-by-hop forwarding, it can usually reduce uncontrolled detours and make the connection between entry and exit clearer. For sustained transfers, video meetings, remote desktops and extended streaming output, a stable path often matters more than a single connection that looks fast.

These routes generally require higher resource costs, so they are better suited to tasks where continuity matters rather than every type of access by default. For opening pages, reading documents or completing short queries, relay and direct routes may already be suitable. Do not treat IEPL as the only answer for every scenario; choose based on task duration and the cost of interruption.

RELAY

Relay: Rerouting Between Entry and Exit

A relay route first sends the connection to a suitable entry point, then forwards it through an intermediate node toward the target region. Its purpose is not to add distance, but to avoid a poor direct combination between the local network and a remote exit. For cross-provider and cross-region access, relays can split a volatile long path into links that are easier to manage.

Relay costs and routing complexity generally fall between IEPL and direct routes, making them suitable for everyday browsing, streaming and routine work. The relay node is part of the full connection, so a poor entry choice can add waiting time. Start with a nearby entry, then check whether the final exit meets the destination service’s regional requirements.

DIRECT

Direct: Simple Structure, Greater Dependence on the Local Network

A direct route connects the current network straight to a remote exit, creating a simpler path with fewer intermediate scheduling steps. It suits light browsing, file access and situations where the local network already connects smoothly to the target region. Direct does not mean fixed quality; inter-network links, international exits and the destination network all affect the final experience.

Direct routes generally have lower resource costs, making them useful as a regular option or a baseline for troubleshooting. If a relay route behaves unexpectedly, switching to direct can help identify whether the issue lies with the entry, forwarding path or destination website. Conversely, if direct varies noticeably during busy periods, compare a nearby relay or IEPL route.

USE CASE MATRIX

Choose an Exit by Use Case

Identify what the task requires first, then choose a city and route type. A region is only the starting point; the destination service, connection duration and sensitivity to interruptions are more direct criteria.

Everyday Browsing

For browsing international websites, reviewing information and handling short queries, start with a geographically nearby exit. Shorter paths generally respond more quickly and reduce waiting as page resources load in sequence. Try a nearby relay or direct route first instead of choosing a distant exit immediately.

If a website serves different content by region, switch the exit to the target region. When a page opens but images, login components or download areas fail to load fully, try another route type in the same region rather than switching through several countries. This makes it easier to distinguish regional detection from a path-specific issue.

Streaming

Streaming depends first on the region of the content library and only then on route type. Choose a region marked as supported in the table, then use a client entry marked for streaming. After connecting, confirm that the content catalog has changed before playback; seeing the homepage alone does not mean subsequent media resources use the same regional check.

If quality changes frequently during playback, compare IEPL and relay routes within the same region instead of changing both region and route type at once. Change one condition at a time to identify which path suits the current network. Platforms can adjust regional detection rules, so previously usable exits should be judged by current results.

AI Tools

AI tools often involve login, regional detection, long-lived connections and streaming output at the same time. A suitable route must do more than open the website; it should keep the path stable while content is generated. Start with a nearby exit in a supported region, then compare relay and IEPL routes to see whether login, conversation loading and long-form output all complete reliably.

Web interfaces and developer tools do not always connect in the same way. A browser may retain an old session and cache, while a command line or editor plugin may use separate network settings. After changing routes, re-establish each relevant connection separately. If only one application fails, check whether it follows the system network before attributing the issue to the node.

Gaming

Games depend more on consistent interaction than peak performance during large downloads. Keep the exit close to the game server’s region and avoid distant cities that introduce obvious detours. Try a nearby relay first, then compare direct in the same region. If the game offers region selection, match the exit region to the selected server region.

Updating resources and joining a match are different tasks. Updates favor sustained transfer, while gameplay depends more on steady connection changes. Use separate routes if necessary. Because routing varies across access networks, a route name cannot replace local testing; compare in-game responsiveness rather than relying only on the route label.

Remote Work

Remote work often puts meetings, document sync, code repositories and remote desktops on one connection. The route must support sustained sessions and multiple services, not just one webpage. Start with a nearby IEPL or relay route and test company resources, collaboration tools and meeting connections together.

If team systems restrict login regions, use a fixed exit matching your regular work region and avoid frequent cross-region changes in a short period. Confirm the route before the meeting and do not repeatedly switch nodes during it. If screen sharing works but audio cuts out, pause background sync that uses bandwidth, then compare another route in the same region.

SELECTION FLOW

A Step-by-Step Route Selection Process

Effective troubleshooting is not random switching. Fix the target, narrow the region and compare paths within that region. Change one condition at a time so the result remains meaningful.

TARGET

Confirm the Target Region

First identify the region associated with the target website, content library, collaboration system or game server. If the service has no regional requirement, start with a nearby exit. Once the target region is clear, avoid switching across regions for the moment.

ENTRY

Choose a Nearby Entry

The entry point affects how the local network reaches international routes. Compare nearby cities or regions first, rather than choosing a much more distant entry for its exit name. When the client shows multiple routes of the same type, connect to them one by one for verification.

ROUTE

Compare Route Types

Keep the exit region unchanged while switching among IEPL, relay and direct routes. Open the same page and perform the same actions on each, observing the full login, loading and sustained-connection process instead of judging by a single opening speed.

VERIFY

Check the Actual Use Case

Browsing, streaming, AI tools, gaming and work require different checks. Complete one full workflow in the real use case. Opening the homepage only confirms basic connectivity; it does not mean the rest of the session is suitable.

ROUTE NOTES

Server Location FAQ

The route table is a static index of regions and types. Actual connections are affected by the local access network, destination service and time of use, so judge them against the specific task.

Is the nearest server always the best choice?
Not necessarily. Distance determines only part of the basic path; inter-provider connectivity, entry-point organization and the destination website’s network matter too. For ordinary browsing, start with a nearby region. If the destination service has a clear regional requirement, meet that requirement first, then compare route types within the same region.
Is IEPL suitable for every use case?
IEPL is better suited to tasks that prioritize continuity, long-lived connections and a stable path. For light browsing or a smooth local connection to the target exit, relay and direct routes may be more appropriate. Assess route cost and value against the task rather than fixing every connection to one type.
Why are multiple route types available in the same city?
The city identifies the exit location, while the route type identifies the path used to reach it. The same exit may be reached through IEPL, relay or direct routes, with differences in entry, cross-network transit and scheduling. Keep the city constant when comparing them, then observe the effect of route type.
How should the streaming support label be understood?
Supported means the region offers routes intended for that use case; it does not mean every entry in the region has the same configuration. Choose a route marked for the relevant purpose and follow the content region currently shown by the target platform. If platform rules change, try a backup route in the same region.
What if an app still uses the old connection after switching routes?
Some browsers, desktop apps and developer tools retain existing sessions. After switching routes, reopen the relevant pages or re-establish the application connection, and check whether the app follows system network settings. If other apps work normally, investigate the individual app’s separate network configuration first.
Can different devices use different regions?
Yes. VPNSQ supports unlimited devices, and each device can choose a route for its own task. For example, keep a work device on the work region while selecting the content region for an entertainment device. This makes usage boundaries clearer than having every device share one exit.
ROUTE SUMMARY

Region First, Route Type Second

First identify the region required by the destination service, then compare IEPL, relay and direct routes within that region. VPNSQ offers 90+ countries / 200+ routes, unlimited device access, and support for Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux. No email address is required to register; a username and password are enough.

Start Free View Guides
Start Free